Today "Dogmeat" posted this in response to a post made by another person.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The issue of mind control is pretty much at the bottom of UFO research.Placing lazar and lear in context with time travel experiments and bigfoot is similar to the way Close Encounters of the Third kind showed the UFO witnesses being questioned and the old dude stands up and says "I saw big foot once." Many seeing (the reports) that context assume that all reports are the same and so are all reporters. Kooks, nut cases and publicity hounds. Many who study UFO related material are used to this and ignore the stuff that is just unsubstantiated or not really focused.
Mind control is simply having influence over mental processes. When you see a jumble of data, some valid and some marginal the normal response is to either embrace all of it or select the parts that make sense. Making posts that clearly emphasize or contrast information are more helpful than ones with broken syntax, partial cut and paste or even worse in my opinion repeating another researcher's work verbatim with out adding their own thoughts or opinions. While legitimate researchers try and prove how gravity works and what electromagnetism is others seek out Bigfoot, Time travel,UFO/Alien and the existance of the soul.
This is a great comment that casts light on the main problem in UFOlogy for the last several years. For every Bob Lazar type of story there are a load of chupa cabras and channeled aliens speaking through so called expert investigators. Don't get me wrong I think that all of this has it's place in any real effort to study the sociological interactions of people and reality. Most people NEVER have a close encounter and seldom see strange animals on the rampage and even less have someone from the Planet Clairion telling them that the truth is an exclusive only to "The Galactic counsel" or whatever name is given.
The fact is that for years strange things have happened in front of witnesses and that explanations are wide ranging. Hard facts are scarce and making sense of the issues is HARD work not something that you can grab from a forum in five minutes. I have seen young people that admitted they came to a forum like this one, took a quick look and joined 'Psicop' and became staunch skeptics as well as instant experts on UFO. One guy went on to make thousands of dollars on his website that was pretty much lifted entirely from other's web pages. (He switched out some names and reworked the ideas) . He is considered expert because of his "work" remaining online and having revenue generating abilities. His actual worth as a researcher is probably about even with my ability to walk on water.
This seems like a genuine no-brainer to me.
Even though weather warfare has been blamed (contrail-chemtrails) by conspiracy oriented web sites, many so called experts are far from it. A smart politician will try and keep the voters happy. It does not REALLY matter if the voters are influenced by mainly talk radio hosts who are paid to be 'over the top' or that their main sense of news is a watered down soup of propaganda and corporately sponsored lies.
However an elected official with a vested interest in preserving the environment and the future of humans on the globe should and will inform them selves about whatever threats exist, even politically incorrect ones such as Global Warming.
The average person wants fun and entertainment, not scary thoughts about the premature closure of the party house and endless supply of bread and circuses...
Unbalance in the eco-system is a very new item of interests to some people and a reason for concern to everyone. So ,I would say that indeed it pays to remain quiet and just buy and spend and eat and drink and die. But where is the future in THAT?
